View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002299 | libpasastro | General | public | 20-03-15 09:02 | 20-03-15 17:25 |
| Reporter | Mattia Verga | Assigned To | Patrick Chevalley | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Summary | 0002299: libpasraw has two different licenses in files | ||||
| Description | I'm opening the bug here since libpasraw doesn't have it's own section: while packaging it for Fedora a user make me notice that the LICENSE file is GPLv3, while in copyright file the project is listed GPLv2+ | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
Hi Mattia, thank you to report this error. This change must clarify it is really GPLv3: https://github.com/pchev/libpasraw/commit/300061f513eea60d9f7127a49bfc90a5ceebfb47 Is this OK now? |
|
|
Yes, thanks. I'm trying to get it available on Fedora repositories, but I'm facing some meticulous person opinions: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813563 |
|
|
Good. Please tell me if other change are need. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20-03-15 09:02 | Mattia Verga | New Issue | |
| 20-03-15 16:12 | Patrick Chevalley | Assigned To | => Patrick Chevalley |
| 20-03-15 16:12 | Patrick Chevalley | Status | new => feedback |
| 20-03-15 16:12 | Patrick Chevalley | Note Added: 0006385 | |
| 20-03-15 16:47 | Mattia Verga | Note Added: 0006387 | |
| 20-03-15 16:47 | Mattia Verga | Status | feedback => assigned |
| 20-03-15 17:25 | Patrick Chevalley | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 20-03-15 17:25 | Patrick Chevalley | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 20-03-15 17:25 | Patrick Chevalley | Note Added: 0006388 |
