View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002076 | SkyChart | 1-Software | public | 19-02-06 18:29 | 19-02-08 09:31 |
| Reporter | Sasa | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Platform | Linux | OS | Ubuntu 64-bit | OS Version | 18.10 |
| Product Version | 4.1 SVN | ||||
| Summary | 0002076: BGRA with CDC vs OPM | ||||
| Description | Open Package Manager (OPM) makes real confusion having many problematic packages. Personally, I avoiding to use any. However, is there any difference in provided BGRA by OPM and that one provided with CDC? It is not confusing for me since I do not use OPM, but in general it may be in some way confusing to have two versions available. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
Open Package Manager => Onilne Package Manager |
|
|
As I say in the VTV issue I never use OPM, and I must include all the components for an autonomous compilation on headless machine. The main difference with the standard BGRA is I add a specific package that not include the OpenGL units: bgrabitmappack_nogl. CdC do not use this OpenGL function but if they where compiled in the package this add two or three OpenGL library as static requirement for the program. And I have a case a basic Fedora installation do not include this library making skychart to fail to start. Otherwise this is the same, I update my version to 9.9.3 from the bgra git about 10 days ago. |
|
|
I believe all is clear now. Thank you. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19-02-06 18:29 | Sasa | New Issue | |
| 19-02-06 18:44 | Sasa | Note Added: 0005344 | |
| 19-02-06 20:45 | Patrick Chevalley | Note Added: 0005347 | |
| 19-02-08 01:42 | Sasa | Note Added: 0005362 | |
| 19-02-08 09:31 | Patrick Chevalley | Status | new => resolved |
| 19-02-08 09:31 | Patrick Chevalley | Resolution | open => no change required |
